History Essay Spanish Civil War free essay sample

On the other hand, the war on land took the biggest number of lives, and that was one of the important consequences of the war. Spanish Civil War had consequences not only on Spain but on the other countries too. Among foreign powers USSR, Germany and Italy were hit by effects the most. The Civil War brought huge complications to Spain in social, economic and political aspects. Therefore Spain suffered huge consequences. Around 100,000 Republicans and 70,000 Nationalists lost their lives in the war. The war was something new for them, because they weren’t involved in World War II and the fact that civilians were targets was surprising. But these killings continued even after the war, when Franco decided to purge his regime from the opponents, and that was called the â€Å"White Terror†. This war led to division into the Spanish society, which lasted for decades. Spain’s economy was devastated after the war and almost all workers were killed. We will write a custom essay sample on History Essay Spanish Civil War or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Therefore, Spain couldn’t recover for a long time. But the lack of skilled workers wasn’t the only reason of its slow recovery, there was also the fact that infrastructure was hardly destroyed and that the Franco’s policy of autarky stopped any future economy development. The Civil War led to the high inflation, because of the cost of fighting war, and the method to pay that was printing money. Franco’s dictatorship was one of the consequences of the war, and that caused a lot of problems in country. All land reforms made by republicans were cancelled; therefore Spain’s agricultural economy remained inefficient and ineffective. With outbreak of World War II Spain’s economy started improving, because Franco decided to be neutral in this war, but this also brought the continuity of Spain’s isolation. This isolation was result of the Civil War and it lasted until Franco’s death in 1975. Due to the Franco’s regime and his decision of cleaning the country from Republicans, half a million Spaniards went to exile. They included most of the Spanish intellectuals. The main Franco’s aim was to make as biggest division between victors and vanquished ad he could. So, after the war he forbade use of Catalan, Basque and Galician languages and centralised all power in Madrid. Then, Republicans who escaped imprisonment couldn’t find jobs, and were highly discriminated. Division of Spanish society was introduced into the whole segments of living. Therefore no one dared to stand against the Franco’s policy. Based on Spanish isolation and the fact that there was no modernization for 36 years, we can say that Spain was â€Å"frozen in time† during the Franco’s dictatorship. Spanish Civil War had effects on the international level, too. It influenced on some countries and their relations. USSR was one of the countries which were on the republican side, and the Franco’s win had effects on them. The fact that communism was defeated undermined their national credibility. Therefore they lost big number their supporters on the West. USSR came into this war in order to spread communism and to ally with Britain and France against the Nationalism. However, both of these aims were not successful. So Stalin decided to change his policy. He realised that neither the British nor the French were not willing to join against Germany. Because of that, the war pushed him to make a deal with Nazi Germany. The war contributed to the polarization of Europe. Italy drew closer to Germany as a result of the conflict, and Britain and France drew closer together, as well. Italy suffered several military setbacks in a war to which they were committed. This commitment made Italy even more dependent on its one ally, Germany. The cooperation between Germany and Italy destroyed the â€Å"Stresa Front† and reduced chances of stopping Hitler on minimum. Britain and France drew together as a result of their common desire to maintain non-intervention and also through their joint naval program to stop Mediterranean piracy. British and French non-intervention gave courage to Hitler to continue with his plans. Before 1938 he planned to avoid a war and to ally himself with British, but by the time he lost his respect to Britain because of its isolation policy and it made him more aggressive. This war was very useful to Hitler. He reckoned what he shouldn’t and should do and what kind of mistakes he should avoid. Also he learned how importan t air power was and that bombing of civilians was, in some extent, was effective. Hence, it gave him a lot of freedom and self-confidence since Nazi party won the war. The result of the Spanish Civil War was that Britain and France, by drawing closer together, moved further away from Italy and the Soviet Union. Both Italy and to a lesser extent the USSR were subsequently drawn toward Germany. Furthermore, the Spanish Civil War and Britain and Frances Non-Intervention policy led Hitler to begin to believe that he could manipulate the weak democracies to achieve his foreign policy ends. Now it is a question to what extent was the Spanish Civil War a cause of World War II.

Free Essays on Juvenile Arson

Youth Arson There was a time when children were considered innocent, when kids could only do harmless things. This is not the case any more in this day and age. There are many different explanations and ideas concerning the reasons for why criminal behavior has developed by such young ages. Two theories to consider when discussing the acts of arson in youth are the Neutralization Theory and Social Control Theory. First the Neutralization Theory was developed by David Matza, in which developed from the classical school. This theory was developed based on the idea of free will. The idea being all crime resulted from a choice that could potentially be made by anyone and that most crime could be explained through human nature. A youth that commits a crime such as arson does it on their own free will. They made the individual choice to commit this crime. Youths that are delinquent are able to commit crimes and come up with good reason why it was not their fault. They do use one of five neutralization techniques that Matza has developed. The youths free will allows this neutralization process to take place. This process includes two key elements. The first element being preparation. A teen will prepare themselves before committing their crime by using a variety of different methods. The younger children who commit arson are not going to be able to grasp this concept of preparation, but juveniles a ges 13- 18 do. Juvenile offenders consider methods of preparation such as the likelihood of getting caught if there are police officers in the area, how others might have committed the same act without getting caught, and take into account the amount of punishment they may get. The juvenile also things about his past experiences committing the same crime and learns from his mistakes. The second element in this theory is desperation. Desperation plays a part in the juvenile choice to commit arson by offering them a free will to commit such an... Free Essays on Juvenile Arson Free Essays on Juvenile Arson Youth Arson There was a time when children were considered innocent, when kids could only do harmless things. This is not the case any more in this day and age. There are many different explanations and ideas concerning the reasons for why criminal behavior has developed by such young ages. Two theories to consider when discussing the acts of arson in youth are the Neutralization Theory and Social Control Theory. First the Neutralization Theory was developed by David Matza, in which developed from the classical school. This theory was developed based on the idea of free will. The idea being all crime resulted from a choice that could potentially be made by anyone and that most crime could be explained through human nature. A youth that commits a crime such as arson does it on their own free will. They made the individual choice to commit this crime. Youths that are delinquent are able to commit crimes and come up with good reason why it was not their fault. They do use one of five neutralization techniques that Matza has developed. The youths free will allows this neutralization process to take place. This process includes two key elements. The first element being preparation. A teen will prepare themselves before committing their crime by using a variety of different methods. The younger children who commit arson are not going to be able to grasp this concept of preparation, but juveniles a ges 13- 18 do. Juvenile offenders consider methods of preparation such as the likelihood of getting caught if there are police officers in the area, how others might have committed the same act without getting caught, and take into account the amount of punishment they may get. The juvenile also things about his past experiences committing the same crime and learns from his mistakes. The second element in this theory is desperation. Desperation plays a part in the juvenile choice to commit arson by offering them a free will to commit such an...

EU Law problem scenario Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

EU Law problem scenario - Essay Example In this similar context, Bekka feels that such acts are irrelevant. Moreover, it has been viewed that she has been also engaged in sale of tinted film which is also restricted for sale in State Y as these products leads to decrease visibility and thereby causing accidents. On the contrary, she admits that such law in State X is indeed not applicable and being a Member State of European Union (EU), laws in both the State i.e. in State X and State Y must be similar. On the other hand Klaus who is married to Haruka, a Japanese national is struggling regarding residence permit. It has been observed that the residential permit of Haruka for State Y was ending and her permit would not be renewed as told by the local immigration office and thus she had to leave the country. In this regard, Klaus strongly realized that being lived in State Y for whole life, it is not justifiable to restrict his wife from living with him in his own country. At the same time, he has been confronted with anothe r problem related with the permission given by Minister for Environmental Affairs about establishment of waste disposal centre adjacent to his property. He firmly believed that such establishment would have radical impact on the flora and fauna of the surrounding area. Moreover, the bad odor released from the waste disposal centre would create significant problem in his hostel business. People are now reluctant to stay in his hostel and further he feels that waste disposal centre should be closed or shifted to another area. Contextually, the paper closely evaluates certain issues of law related with the case of Bekka and Klaus and advise them relating to their concerned matter. Issues Related with EU Law (Bekka) The open movement of goods is one of the critical factors leading towards the success of the EU Member States. The internal business market within the European Union makes easy to buy and sell goods in different Member States. A single European marketplace provides a strong platform in an open and competitive environment1. From lawful standpoint, it can be stated that the principle of free trade of goods is a main element in developing internal business market in the EU. It is viewed to be one of the economic autonomies that frame by the Member States of the EU. The EU defines the scope and content of the principle by prohibiting unjustified restrictions on intra-EU trade. Many of the vital restrictions on free movement of goods have been removed over the years to facilitate smooth functioning of EU trade. The prohibition of any products needs to be justified on the grounds of public ethics, public protection and protection of health as well as life of human, animals and plants. Contextually, member states may possess the right to ban any product on the basis of morality grounds. Therefore, EU law prescribed that goods brought from one state must comply with the national provisions concerning morality factor of the state where the product is being sold . Another important ground for restraint of free movement of goods can be acceptable on the basis of life as well as health of humans. EU law states that any Member States can impose barriers on any kind of products that affects national health and life of human, animal and plants. EU law also ensures safety of customers against deceptive advertisements. EU law also proclaimed that the authorities in one state cannot curtail customers from buying goods of